Sunday, May 20, 2007

You don't have the right not to be offended

Warning: this post contains explicit material.
WASHINGTON -- Continued attacks on our first amendment rights: The Opie and Anthony Show came to a screeching halt on its "uncensored" XM Radio channel last week. There's a reason there's a word in quotation marks in the previous sentence -- because it's needed.

For those of you who don't know, Greg "Opie" Hughes and Anthony Cumia are what the radio business call "shock jocks." But the duo often resents the comparison to most other radio jocks who, as O&A say, deploy hack humor and run-of-the-mill shtick. A few years ago, Opie and Anthony got essentially the best gig on satellite radio -- arguably, the best gig on radio. In August of 2004, it was announced that the team would headline XM's "uncensored" channel, XL 202 -- High Voltage. The channel was later renamed The Virus, but kept its XL status. The XL means the channel boasts and extra large portion of extreme language. Essentially, Opie and Anthony were given as much leeway they wanted just short of libelious material.

Now that you've gotten the crash course on O&A, here's the bit for their suspension. In the past, and several times, Opie and Antony have used vagrants as part of their humor. There's no limit to the humorous possibilities when the homeless are given free reign over a radio mic. On a recent show, as I'm sure you've heard, one of the many homeless expressed his desire to have forced sex with, among others, U.S. Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice. Now, that in itself wasn't enough, I don't believe, to warrant outcry. But that Opie and Anthony seemed to egg on the tirade. Following a mild apology by XM Radion, the pair showed no remorse. That's what angered people the most.

The fact that Opie and Anthony didn't seem to "learn their lesson" ruffled the feathers of the XM brass, and, thus, a 30-day suspension followed.

This situation is drawing many comparisons to that of Don Imus, a conclusion that seems obvious ... to idiots. The fact of the matter is that Imus said what he said on the open, and FCC compliant, broadcast waves of CBS Radio and MSNBC TV. Opie and Anthony committed their "blunder" on what they were told was an uncensored and unrestricted radio station, which doesn't have to follow FCC regulations. The XL rating for the channel allows for XM subscribers to block the channel if they don't want even the chance of hearing. Apparently, just changing to a different station isn't enough (though, I'm aware of the parents who wouldn't want their children tuning into 202).

This is a show that's crossed the line numerous times, but because it was allowed to! That was their job, to cross the line. Why? Because there are pests out there who pay good money to hear it. Opie and Anthony's show isn't advertiser driven like most terrestrial radio programs. Its numbers are strengthened by XM's subscribers. Reportedly, when the company announced the suspension of the personalities, upwards of 20,000 subscriptions were canceled in protest. That may sound unbelievable, but there are easily that many people who subscribed to XM's service solely for the O&A Show.

All that aside, there are two underlying issues here. One, obviously, being that of free speech. Anthony Cumia has, several times, said, "People have a right to free speech, they do not have a right not to be offended." Basically, he's saying, if what he says pisses you off, change the channel. The second issue here is the employee-employer relationship -- being treated fairly at work. Now, I'm not saying it's fair to be able to talk about raping political figures. I'm saying its fair to, if you're told you can say whatever you want, to say whatever you want. We could sit here and argue the free speech issue until we all go blue in the faces. I, being a journalist, am a strong freedom of speech advocate. But that O&A were given carte blanche to shock and entertain their audience, and then to be suspended by XM Radio baffles me. There wasn't even that much media outcry from this incident as in Imus' case. Obviously, Condoleeza was a little (to use the work lightly) offended. But, as Anthony put it, in a free speech world, no one has the right not to be offended.

In addition, the idea of censorship on the supposed "uncensored" channel has actually enticed a much larger outcry that the comments themselves. To join that outcry, visit the People Against Censorship Web site.

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

The concentrated form of Chameleon Politics

Sometimes is fun just to drink a little booze (a little, for real ... jeez!) and put your hands to the keyboard. I saw a 60 Minutes special on presidential hopeful Mitt Romney yesterday, and I heard a phrase I'd heard a thousand times before: Chameleon Politics. I know politicians will waiver a bit on their stances (or at least how vehemently they'll speak on those stances) depending on their surroundings. I mean, didn't we all see Hillary Clinton become a black woman in a Southern church earlier this year? But, until yesterday, I'd never really seen "Chameleon Politics" in its concentrated form.

You know how, if you take the freezer-section orange juice and add water to it, you get a gallon of juice? But, before that juice is made, you have this awfully strong tasting paste. That paste is what I saw of "Chameleon Politics" from Mitt Romney! (OK, that last part may have been the booze talking, just a little bit)

I've never been on the "Romney for White House" bandwagon, though I've been keeping him somewhat on my radar for just over a year now. Reference this post from last April. In that post, I'll proudly say, that I predicted his presidential run in '08. I also called him "the health care guy," and it looks like he's going to be running on more of a "fix up the country like I already did the business world" kind of guy. Whatever. He somewhat irked me back in April of 2006, but, I'll have to admit, he's been slowly winning me over since then.

My girlfriend even said to me recently, "Aren't you a Mitt Romney fan?" I don't think I'd reached the "fan" level yet, but I was getting close. OK, let me get back to the 60 Minutes piece before I totally lose you. I watched him, in the span of 10 minutes, wish-wash on several key moral issues. MORAL issues! Not just bill issues, law issues or sociological issues, but core issues to our country's two major political parties. Obviously, he didn't wish-wash on these issues withing the exact span of 10 minutes; it was a summary piece, after all. But, he changed his stance on such usually unwavering issues as gun control and abortion. That's right, he essentially went from anti-gun to joining the NRA and from pro-choice to pro-life, among sever others. Not that you can totally prove the "correctness" of either side gun or abortion issues, but, my question is this: Do we want to elect a president who so easily changes sides on issues that most people find concrete (whichever way they may side)?

What happens if I vote for a candidate who believes A, B and C ... and six months after he's in office, s/he changes his/her mind to believe D, E and F? I don't like that scenario at all. I have to say, Romney will have to REALLY impress me over the next year and a half to get my vote. But right now, he doesn't have it -- at all. Whether a politician believes in what I believe ... I can respect that person. I really can't stand a flaky, side-changing, get-elected-above-all-else politico. Is that what Romney is? I can't say for sure. But, for now, it surely looks that way.

Sunday, May 13, 2007

New software ... not much (that you'll notice) has changed

Well, Google and Blogger have recently joined forces. Since I love just about everything else that Google chooses to dabble in (gMail and Picasa), I decided to convert my blog software from WordPress to Blogger. Now, I did like WordPress, but I've found everything I liked about WordPress was also on Blogger. And Google, once it gets its hands on something, usually improves it greatly. Here's hoping.

I found the Blogger software so easy to use, that I went ahead and imported all my old posts from WordPress on over to Blogger. So, now all the old posts I'm sure you loved are conveniently located on the new server.